Knowledge Filters: All solid evidence against the Theory of Evolution is automatically rejected .

Filtering: “Selective presentation or deliberate manipulation of information to make it more acceptable or favorable to its recipient.”

Read more:

This is the ‘Human factor’ at work in ‘Science’, and is why the vast % of ‘Research’ ends up ‘proving’ the hypothesis of the ‘researcher’.
Simply put…. they impose their theory upon the data… cherry picking whatever they can make fit their arguments, and ignoring/ passing over/ covering up any ‘anomalies’ which go against their ambitions.
this is how/ why ‘evolutionary scientist can go and investigate a river and ‘discover’ how it “makes fish evolve”….


The Video below at first appearance looks very dubious, yet the Guest speaker presents some very interesting evidence to support the idea that dinosaurs were still around until a few thousand years ago, rather than millions upon millions.

What is also telling is how the scientific community reacts to such evidence which threatens to overthrow all their cherished beliefs.
The truth is that none of the pet theorys of atheism actually have a solid scientific foundation…. materialism, evolution, abiogenesis, etc.
all of them are purely based upon the assumption of atheism.
Ie none of these ideas are provable via observation and experiment.
Thus the claims made by atheists that science supports their theories is a gigantic lie… none the less they are prepared to not only cling to it, but to actually deny *all evidence* which proves them to be wrong.
It’s worth watching.


^^^ Watch That Video!

Update: 12/14
Researchers have unearthed a fossil fish so well preserved, it still has traces of eye tissues. What’s more, these fossil tissues reveal that the 300-million-year-old fish called Acanthodes bridgei (pictured), like its living relatives, possessed two types of photoreceptors called rods and cones—cells that make vision possible. This is the first time that mineralized rods and cones have been found conserved in a vertebrate fossil, the team reports online today in Nature Communications, as soft tissues of the eye normally begin to disintegrate within days of death… more>>> Three-hundred-million-year-old fossil fish still has traces of eye tissue

23 thoughts on “Knowledge Filters: All solid evidence against the Theory of Evolution is automatically rejected .”


    ARCHAEOLOGIST ACCIDENTALLY DISPROVES EVOLUTION ON 60 MINUTES A scientific experiment using "million" year old dinosaur bones has yielded fresh elastic tissue. This is coffin nails to Darwinian lawlessness, as it proves the young Earth. Contrary to the evolutionary perspective that dinosaurs walked the earth millions and millions of years ago, this specimen of living tissue utterly disproves that notion. Furthermore, before cultures were capable or even interested in archaeology, they had spiritual and cultural themes of Dragons as central to their story-telling. If practically every culture all over the world has fables about giant lizards and there involvement with mankind, is it not so far-fetched to conceive the notion that man and dinosaur lived on this Earth simultaneously? The Bible has made clear references to these Giant reptiles:Job 40:15-24King James Version (KJV)Behold now behemoth, which I made with thee; he eateth grass as an ox. Lo now, his strength is in his loins, and his force is in the navel of his belly. He moveth his tail like a cedar: the sinews of his stones are wrapped together. His bones are as strong pieces of brass; his bones are like bars of iron.Isaiah 27:1 – In that day the LORD with his sore and great and strong sword shall punish leviathan the piercing serpent, even leviathan that crooked serpent; and he shall slay the dragon that [is] in the sea.Psalms 74:14 – Thou brakest the heads of leviathan in pieces, [and] gavest him [to be] meat to the people inhabiting the wilderness.Psalms 104:26 – There go the ships: [there is] that leviathan, [whom] thou hast made to play therein.Job 41:1 – Canst thou draw out leviathan with an hook? or his tongue with a cord [which] thou lettest down?

    Posted by True Biblical Christians on Thursday, March 10, 2016


    “Why wasn’t this research published decades ago? It’s possible that modern computer technology allows us to do analyses that couldn’t be performed then. It’s possible that researchers tried, but were unable to get the results published.

    But it’s also possible that these results were marginalized because they didn’t fit with what was considered to be “truth” at the time”

  3. Caught on surveillance camera a man gets struck by lighting twice and lives. Latter at the hospital he told doctors he was going to rob the couple that were walking just ahead of him.

  4. University settles lawsuit with scientist fired after he found soft tissue in dinosaur bones

    By Chad Dou —

    CSUN scientist Mark Armitage found soft tissue in a dinosaur bone, a discovery that throws significant doubt on evolution. Then, two weeks after publishing his findings, he was fired.

    Now California State University at Northridge has paid Armitage a six-figure sum to settle his wrongful termination suit based on religious discrimination. While the university admits no wrongdoing, Armitage’s attorney said they feared losing a protracted lawsuit because of a “smoking gun” email that backed the plaintiff’s case.

    The case of Armitage is the latest to show the mounting hostility Christians face in academics and other public arenas.

  5. Fired Christian Teacher Seeks U.S. Supreme Court Hearing

    By Lee Duigon
    July 06, 2014
    Seven years after he was fired from his job, middle school science teacher John Freshwater hopes the United State Supreme Court will hear his case.

    Maybe you can remember the lurid stories in the national news media about the crazed “Christian” chasing his students to brand crosses on them. Those were quickly shown to be untrue, as you’ll see from the report published by Chalcedon at the time.1

    Freshwater, in 2007, the same year he was fired, had been honored as the Mount Vernon, Ohio, school district’s Teacher of the Year. He was popular with the students and well-respected in the community. If the “branding” story wasn’t true, then why was he fired?

    Late last year the Ohio Supreme Court ruled, 4–3, that Freshwater’s dismissal was justified because he was insubordinate to school officials.

  6. Soft Tissue Fossils Preserved by Toasting?

    A research team described a form of fossilization that it thinks can explain how original proteins have lasted for millions of years in Earth’s crust. It does match certain fossil features, but leaves two key questions unanswered. And that leaves soft tissue fossils still looking quite young.

    Publishing in Nature Communications, Yale University scientist Jasmina Wiemann and colleagues drew two parallels between the soft tissues they found in fossils and tissues they toasted on a hot plate in the lab.1 First, both had darker coloration. This happens often, for example when apple slices darken when left out on the counter. Second, both real and artificial fossils showed similar infrared spectra. These spectra indicate the chemistry of a given sample. In this case, the spectra showed that proteins had crosslinked to form polymers.

  7. NEW ZEALAND 4 Nov 2014
    Forty percent of scientists feel gagged
    10:10 am on 4 November 2014

    Forty percent of scientists answering a survey say they have felt gagged because of management policy or concern over losing funding.

    The Government was considering guidelines to scientists on the difference between speaking about their areas of expertise, and advocacy.

    A total of 384 New Zealand scientists answered the Association of Scientists’ survey, half of whom work in Crown research institutes, or CRIs.

    Association president Nicola Gaston said of those who had not felt gagged, many said they had witnessed it happening to others.

    “There’s an issue around embarrassing the Government, but the funding issue is quite poor so the kinds of commercial funding that come into the CRIs, those contracts are one particular issue.

    “But there’s also the idea of Government funding being effected by speaking out, saying the wrong things, perhaps having a point of view which is not that of the expert reviewers on a particular funding proposal.”

    Dr Gaston said most scientists wanted to know what the new ethics code would be before saying whether they were for or against it.

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *