Government’s Criminal Surveillance Blunder

The Crimes Act 1961
Section 408 Act to bind the Crown
This Act shall bind the Crown.

In theory the Crown is subject to the Crimes Act – being a Crown representative acting for the Crown can not excuse anyone from being prosecuted under the Crimes Act.

The Crimes Act 1961
Section 216B Prohibition on use of interception devices
(1) Subject to subsections (2) to (5), every one is liable to imprisonment for a term not exceeding 2 years who intentionally intercepts any private communication by means of an interception device.

According to the law – whoever intercepted Kim Dotcom’s communications committed a crime. Whoever that was they should be prosecuted under the Crimes Act. It’s hard to imagine a greater breach of this section.

It’s already been admitted publicly that the interceptions were illegal (Although I see the preparation work being done to argue that no devices were involved so therefore it was not a breach of section 216B of the Crimes Act… From the Herald:- Spying on the group began on December 16 last year and ended on January 20 but did not involve installing devices).

The Police have all the information they need to start a criminal investigation and should start investigating shortly… I feel another Tui Billboard coming on. The Police are probably asking themselves “How long can we avoid this and how long is the statute of limitations for illegal interception?”

This entry was posted in Justice, National Party, Privacy. Bookmark the permalink.

2 Responses to Government’s Criminal Surveillance Blunder

  1. Tim says:

    Who can believe that it was simply ‘a mistake’ that the Police and the Spies did not know Dotcom was a NZ Resident????
    Or that John Key did not know anything about anything???
    BULLSHIT!!!!
    This is Blatant Corruption at the Highest levels of our Government and Police!!!!
    They should all be thrown in jail!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *